Location: Northwest Pacific coast
Area and rank: 66,582 square miles (172,447 square kilometers); 71,303 square miles (184,675 square kilometers) including water; twentieth largest state in area
Coastline: 157 miles (253 kilometers) on the Pacific Ocean
Shoreline: 3,026 miles (4,870 kilometers)
Population and rank: 6,897,012 (2012 estimate); thirteenth largest state in population
Capital city: Olympia (46,478 people in 2010 census)
Largest city: Seattle (608,660 people in 2010 census)
Became territory: March 2, 1853
State capitol building in Olympia.
img47_001.jpg
(State of Washington Tourism Development)
Entered Union and rank: November 11, 1889; forty-second state
Present constitution adopted: 1889
Counties: 39
State name: Washington was named for President George Washington
State nicknames: Evergreen State; Chinook State
Motto: Al-ki (American Indian word meaning “by and by”)
State flag: Dark green background with state seal
Highest point: Mount Rainier—14,410 feet (4,392 meters)
Lowest point: Pacific Ocean—sea level
Highest recorded temperature: 118 degrees Fahrenheit (48 degrees Celsius)—Ice Harbor Dam, 1961
Lowest recorded temperature: –48 degrees Fahrenheit (–44 degrees Celsius)—Mazama and Winthrop, 1968
State song: “Washington, My Home”
State tree: Western hemlock
State flower: Coast rhododendron
State bird: Willow goldfinch
State fish: Steelhead trout
National parks: Mount Rainier; North Cascades; Olympic
Washington History
Like its southern neighbor Oregon, Washington is divided into two distinct geographical parts, a wet, forested western portion, and a semi-arid east. Washington’s forests made it one of the nation’s great timber producers, while its dry eastern portion requires extensive irrigation for agricultural productivity. While it shares geographical features with Oregon and Idaho, making up the Pacific Northwest region, Washington’s social and political complexion has its own unique qualities. One reason is that unlike Oregon, Washington was not first settled by farmers.
After the earliest period, in which its white inhabitants were predominantly trappers, Washington’s early history was dominated by extraction industries, such as gold mining and logging. Later, toward the end of the nineteenth century, large industry brought with it conflict between big business and big labor, which affected the state’s social character. Later still, after the middle of the twentieth century, industries that prospered in the state on account of the Cold War left their own indelible imprint on the state’s economy, society, and politics.
Early History. The early history of the area that became Washington was dominated by the struggle for control of the region by Great Britain, Russia, and Spain, followed by the United States. By 1775 Spain was sending expeditions up the Pacific coast, mainly to secure a buffer zone between Russian and British claims and its Mexican territory. Russia asserted claims far distant from Alaska, sending landing parties as far south as California. While Spain and Russia dropped out of the competition by the end of the eighteenth century, Britain opposed its former colonies, now a scrappy young republic. The Americans, for their part, strengthened their claims to the region when, after the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, the expedition of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark arrived and wintered by the Pacific at Fort Clatsop.
Seattle, looking south toward Mount Rainier. The prominent Space Needle, at the left, was built for the 1962 World’s Fair, which took place in Seattle.
img47_004.jpg
(State of Washington Tourism Development)
In 1792, the Americans sent Captain Robert Gray to the northwest, where he discovered the Columbia River and named it after his ship. In the same year, Britain sent an expedition led by George Vancouver to the region. Members of the expedition of British captain James Cook had already discovered the value of sea otter pelts bought from American Indians and sold profitably in China. By 1818 the two nations agreed to share the region. The Pacific North West Company dominated the fur trade until 1821, when it merged with Hudson’s Bay Company, which remained the most influential non-Indian power in the area until 1846.

Native American peoples occupied a key position in the fur trade, especially in the beginning, before white trappers appeared in any numbers and before native populations became depleted. Native Americans provided sea otter pelts and other furs to white traders in exchange for manufactured goods, especially those made of metal, unknown in American Indian cultures. These included tools that added to the Native Americans’ ability to produce goods for themselves. Indians benefited from material goods, but their contact with whites proved catastrophic, since they contracted small pox and other diseases that decimated their numbers. It has been estimated that the population of Native American peoples on the northwest coast declined during the century following 1774 from about 200,000 to about 40,000, or some 80 percent. Moreover, by the 1820’s sea otters were nearly extinct.
By 1810 a second phase of the fur trade began, increasingly dominated by Europeans and centered on beaver and similar mammals. This trade was focused on inland areas and required European trading companies to establish forts and interior avenues of transportation. News of the area finally took hold of the American imagination in the East and Midwest after the success of fur-trading companies illustrated the possibilities of internal development. The stage was set for the arrival of immigrants in large numbers.
The Anglo-American condominium begun in 1818 lasted into the 1840’s. By then, however, the U.S. westward expansion, with its drive to possess the continent as its manifest destiny, brought hundreds, then thousands of American settlers to the region. During the early 1840’s, Hudson’s Bay Company, which was interested in commerce, not settlement, moved its base of operations northward, focusing on the area that became British Columbia.
Although American nationalists sought lands north of the fifty-fourth parallel, the United States, negotiating in 1846 with far-stronger Britain, settled for the forty-eighth parallel as the new boundary. Two years later the Oregon Territory, including what became Washington, was established.
From Territory to State. After the establishment of Oregon Territory in 1848, the population north of the Columbia River grew rapidly. Accordingly, in 1853 the Territory of Washington was formed. A decade later, gold strikes in the eastern portion led to its breaking off to become separately organized as Idaho Territory. Except for adjustments in Puget Sound’s San Juan Islands, Washington’s boundaries were now fixed. Sentiment for statehood strengthened during the Civil War, and in 1867 the territorial legislature urged Congress to admit a new state. Not until 1889, however, did Congress pass the required legislation for statehood, admitting Washington into the Union.
As it was growing toward statehood, Washington experienced an ugly social and moral pathology, in the form of anti-Chinese racism. When economic downturns arrived, labor unions made scapegoats of Chinese laborers, who arrived after 1840. Chinese were reviled for driving down wages, and serious incidents occurred, especially during the mid-1880’s in Seattle, Tacoma, and other cities, when Chinese were driven out. As a result, the Chinese population in the Pacific Northwest dropped sharply.
If few Chinese could resist ill treatment, the same was not always true of the state’s Native American peoples. Prophetic religious visions encouraging American Indians to live by their old customs were one form of resistance. Suing in the courts was another. Such attempts at peaceful resolution of disputes followed the armed conflicts that occurred, for example, between 1855 and 1859, when the influx of miners after gold strikes alarmed the native peoples. Relations between settlers and Native Americans were complicated by the fact that there were different points of view not only among the federal government, the settlers, and the Indians, but within each group as well. Tribes or subtribal bands sometimes fought among themselves over policy toward white society.
Policy toward the American Indians reflected both idealism and self-interest, resulting in the reservation system. Reservations were designed both to separate tribal societies from the settlers and to “civilize” them, that is, to adapt them to the European ways, “detribalizing” and assimilating them to American society. Native American children were taken to boarding schools for this purpose.
The treaty system that reflected this policy was unreliable, however, partly because the U.S. Senate frequently rejected treaties. Moreover, not all tribal members agreed with the treaties as negotiated, and discontent and confusion sometimes followed their signing. Treaties signed in 1854 and 1855 failed to prevent the conflicts of 1855–1858. Both wars and considerable crime broke out among American Indians and settlers between 1850 and 1880. Efforts were made to reform the reservation system and assimilation policy, to little effect. After the 1930’s, however, the goal of assimilation was reconsidered. By the 1970’s, Native Americans were having considerable success defending tribal rights in the courts.
1880’s to 1945. Washington inaugurated its statehood with a government that reflected its past as a frontier society. As the frontier distrusted political power, especially executive power, so did the state. Accordingly, Washington’s constitution called for a plural executive, with a number of elected offices, rather than a single, all-powerful governor. These included, besides governor and lieutenant governor, a secretary of state (chief elections officer), attorney general, treasurer, auditor, and others.
In the twenty-first century, ferryboats remain an important mode of transportation connecting the mainland with the peninsulas and islands of Puget Sound.
img47_006.jpg
(©Walter Siegmund/Wikimedia Commons)
The state’s politics in the next decades followed national trends as well as home-grown movements. Populism and radical parties and sects arose between 1880 and 1920, making a lasting impact. Reformers were influential because the state saw itself in a formative, malleable stage of collective life. The state’s constitution showed strong Populist influence, distrusting big business by banning gifts or loans of public money and credit to private enterprise. The constitution’s bill of rights protected individual rights even more than the federal Bill of Rights. Not surprisingly, the People’s Party candidate for president received 22 percent of the vote in 1892.
The Progressive movement also deeply affected Washington, as it did its southern neighbor. Around the turn of the century, like Oregon, Washington voters gained the powers of initiative, referendum, and, later, recall elections. Municipal ownership of utilities and urban planning became public policy, and nature conservation, a recurring feature of the state’s politics, appeared. In addition, radicalism and utopianism had some influence; the International Workers of the World (IWW), a Marxist party founded in Chicago in 1905, was active on the political fringes prior to and just after World War I.
By the Depression years of the 1930’s, radicalism was a spent force, and, as elsewhere in the nation, federal policies attempted to come to the state’s rescue. In building dams and in other projects, federal spending became an essential element in the state’s economy, prefiguring what was to come. The most important single project was the Grand Coulee dam, but other dams were constructed. In addition, the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was active in parks and forests; and there existed public housing and irrigation projects, among other federal programs.
Power generated from the Columbia River Basin was essential for the defense industries that sprang up during the war years. Among them were atomic development works at Hanford, where the plutonium for the nation’s first atomic weapons was produced. Later it was discovered that the Hanford nuclear reactor also produced much radioactive waste that endangered both people and the natural world.
Postwar Economy and Politics. After World War II, many thought the state’s economy would suffer badly from the nation’s military stand-down, but they were mistaken. The advent of the Cold War brought further defense spending to Washington, including additional development of the Hanford atomic facility. By the 1950’s the Boeing Company near Seattle was receiving large contracts from the Pentagon. Federal spending also helped the state with the continuing development of hyroelectric power and crop-irrigation facilities through dam construction. Thanks to voter loyalty, the state was gaining influence in Washington, D.C., through the reelection of its senators Warren Magnuson and Henry “Scoop” Jackson, sometimes called “the senator from Boeing.” Later, Representative Tom Foley became Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.
To celebrate the success of the state and its principal city, a world’s fair was held in Seattle in 1962. Its futuristic free-standing tower, known as the Space Needle, became an icon of forward-thrusting technological prowess and self-confidence and was widely imitated around the world. As might be expected, the influence of the Boeing Company on the exposition was widely noticeable.
Later decades, however, saw a different side of Washington’s success, as environmentally conscious activists sought to counterbalance the influence of timber and other industries. This was especially evident as the state’s nuclear-power board defaulted on bonds used to build nuclear reactors, all but one of which were never completed. This was also evident as early as 1974, when Spokane opened Expo ’74, the world’s first environmental world’s fair. By the end of the century, Washington was economically thriving on a balance of “hightech” industries such as Boeing and Microsoft, tourism, and agriculture. Although anti-Asian sentiment was long outdated, civil rights issues for African Americans remained. Environmental problems, such as the decline of salmon, a state icon, also remained, and there was marked resistance to further economic development that would endanger the state’s natural environment.
Terrorism Investigations. Around the dawn of the new millennium, Washington was a focus of Islamic terrorism investigations. The state was jittery after a suspicious customs official at the border crossing in the small town of Port Angeles in late 1999 arrested a Middle Eastern man with explosives in his car. In 2002, a federal grand jury probed whether two defunct Seattle mosques had ties with the terrorist organization al-Qaeda. In July of the same year, federal agents had arrested two men said to have documents in their possession describing methods of poisoning water supplies. One of those arrested had close relations with one of the closed Seattle mosques. There were a series of other raids, indictments, and accusations of terror connections. Thus, U.S. Customs raided a Seattle-area money transfer office run by Somalis, who were also said to be linked with al-Qaeda.
Moreover, in May, 2003, Seattle held a biological and radiological terrorism drill. The terrorist threat that affected the entire West Coast of the nation erupted again in August, 2006, when part of the port of Seattle was closed after bomb-sniffing dogs reacted to shipping containers from Pakistan, though no explosives were found. The state was also subject to homegrown terrorism. In June, 2001, a bomb went off at a Tacoma clinic where abortions were sometimes performed, but no one was hurt.
During this period, officials also grew concerned over Washington’s border and its penetration by illegal immigrants. The Seattle-Vancouver, Canada, area functioned as a major port of entry for human smugglers. In 2000, the U.S. and Canada signed a border security pact. However, in the same year, continued smuggling of aliens led to the deaths of several Chinese immigrants found in Seattle shipping containers.
Boeing. Among economic problems in the state, the Boeing Company, one of the state’s principal employers, was cited by Federal Aviation Administration inspectors as having more than one hundred specific problems said to be “deeply rooted” and “systemic.” The following year, Boeing announced it was relocating corporate headquarters from Seattle, its base since 1916, to Chicago.
Politics. A controversy over the official recognition of an Indian tribe, making it eligible to open gambling facilities, erupted in 2001. In January, the outgoing Clinton administration recognized the Duwamish tribe, but the incoming Bush administration voided the decision, citing procedural errors. Privately, it was suggested that the tribe received recognition as a payoff after it contributed to the Democratic Party. The tribe traces its lineage to renowned Chief Seattle.
In electoral politics, Gary Locke, the nation’s first Chinese American governor, was reelected in 2000. In that election, Democrat Al Gore took the state’s presidential electoral votes. After confirmation by a recount, Republican U.S. senator Slade Gorton was defeated by Democrat Maria Cantwell, who spent $10 million of her own money, by just 2,229 votes, or .09 percent. Nationally, the state went to Al Gore, who received the state’s eleven electoral votes by a 50-45 percent margin.
In the 2004 governor’s race, when term limits stopped incumbent Locke from running, an exceptionally close contest put Democrat Christine Gregoire in the statehouse. Several disputed recounts found her the winner over former state senator Dino Rossi by just 129 votes. In the presidential balloting, the Democrats, headed by John Kerry, again won the state’s electoral votes, defeating George W. Bush by 53 to 46 percent.
Marijuana. In 2011, Washington decriminalized the sale of marijuana for medical purposes, and across the state, numerous dispensaries opened. However, in 2011, federal agents of the Drug Enforcement Agency began raiding several of the stores, seizing records and assets.
Crater of Mount Saint Helens, viewed from the north, several years after the volcano’s 1980 eruption.
img47_007.jpg
Fourteen Seattle-area dispensaries were raided. Advocates of the medical marijuana law noted that these raids were surprising considering that support for safe and legal access to medical marijuana runs about 85 percent in polling, while nationwide, support for such programs has been running at 70 to 80 percent. Advocates also point out that the Obama administration spent nearly $300 million on enforcement efforts in medical marijuana states, outspending the Bush administration by $100 million in under five years.
The state–federal jurisdiction issue promised to get more serious in November 2012, when Washington voters approved a plan to legalize recreational marijuana as distinct from medical marijuana. Fearing that the federal government would seek a court ruling overturning the state law, Washington members of Congress petitioned U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to adopt a moderate policy and respect the will of the voters in Washington state. However, many officials in the federal Department of Justice and in the Drug Enforcement Administration regard state recreational marijuana laws to be a major assault on federal law.
Survey Says…
This section presents current rankings from dozens of public and private sources. It shows how this state ranks in a number of critical categories, including education, job growth, cost of living, teen drivers, energy efficiency, and business environment. Sources include Forbes, Reuters, U.S. News and World Report, CNN Money, Gallup, and Huffington Post.
-
Washington ranked #4 in a government study measuring real gross domestic product (GDP)—the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States. The ranking is based on the percentage change compared with 2011 GDP.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, June 2013; www.bea.gov
-
Washington ranked #14 in a government study measuring real gross domestic product (GDP)—the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States. The ranking is based on the dollar value of its GDP.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, June 2013; www.bea.gov
-
Washington ranked #40 in the 17th edition of “Quality Counts; State of the States,” Education Week's “report card” surveying key education indicators, policy efforts, and educational outcomes.
Education Week, January 4, 2013 (online) and January 10, 2013 (print); www.edweek.org
-
SERI (Science and Engineering Readiness Index) weighs the performance of the states' K-12 schools in preparing students in physics and calculus, the high school subjects considered most important for future scientists and engineers. Washington ranked #20.
Newsletter of the Forum on Education of the American Physical Society, Summer 2011 issue; www.huffingtonpost.com, July 11, 2011; updated October 1, 2012
-
MoneyRates.com ranked Washington #1 on its list of the best to worst states for making a living. Criteria: average income; inflation; employment prospects; and workers' Workplace Environment assessments according to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.
www.money-rates.com, posted April 1, 2013
-
Forbes analyzed business costs, labor supply, regulatory environment, current economic climate, growth prospects, and quality of life, to compile its “Best States for Business” rankings. Washington ranked #11.
www.forbes.com. posted December 12, 2012
-
The 2012 Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, surveyed American's opinions on economic confidence, workplace perceptions, community climate, personal choices, and health predictors to assess the “future livability” of each state. Washington ranked #12.
“Utah Poised to Be the Best State to Live In,” Gallup Wellbeing, www.gallup.com, August 7, 2012
-
On CNBC's list of “America's Top States for Business 2013,” Washington ranked #21. Criteria: measures of competitiveness developed with input from the National Association of Manufacturers, the Council on Competitiveness, and other business groups weighed with the states' own marketing criteria.
www.cnbc.com, consulted July 19, 2013
-
Washington ranked #5 on the “best” end of the Christian Science Monitor's list of “States with the Best (and Worst) Job Growth,” as indicated by year-over-year growth rates from May 2012 to May 2013.
www.csmonitor.com, July 5, 2013
-
Washington ranked #31 on MoneyRates list of “Best-and Worst-States to Retire 2012.” Criteria: life expectancy, crime rate, climate, economic conditions, taxes, job opportunities, and cost of living.
www.money-rates.com, October 22, 2012
-
Washington ranked #49 on the 2013 Bankrate “Best Places to Retire” list ranking the states and District of Columbia on various criteria relating to health, safety, and cost.
www.bankrate.com, May 6, 2013
-
Washington ranked #13 on the Social Science Research Council's “American Human Development Report: The Measure of America,” assessing the 50 states plus the District of Columbia on health, education, and living-standard criteria.
The Measure of America 2013–2014, posted June 19, 2013; www.measureofamerica.org
-
Washington ranked #22 on the Foundation for Child Development's (FCD) Child Well-being Index (CWI). The FCD used the KIDS COUNT report and the National Survey of Children's Health, the only state-level source for several key indicators of child well-being.
Foundation for Child Development, January 18, 2012; fcd-us.org
-
Washington ranked #19 overall according to the 2013 KIDS COUNT Data Book, a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Criteria: children's economic well-being, education, health, and family and community indicators.
KIDS COUNT Data Center's Data Book, released June 20, 2013; http://datacenter.kidscount.org
-
Washington ranked #28 in the children's economic well-being category by the 2013 KIDS COUNT Data Book, a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
KIDS COUNT Data Center's Data Book, released June 20, 2013; http://datacenter.kidscount.org
-
Washington ranked #25 in the children's educational opportunities and attainments category by the 2013 KIDS COUNT Data Book, a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
KIDS COUNT Data Center's Data Book, released June 20, 2013; http://datacenter.kidscount.org
-
Washington ranked #6 in the children's health category by the 2013 KIDS COUNT Data Book, a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
KIDS COUNT Data Center's Data Book, released June 20, 2013; http://datacenter.kidscount.org
-
Washington ranked #17 in the family and community circumstances that factor into children's well-being category by the 2013 KIDS COUNT Data Book, a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
KIDS COUNT Data Center's Data Book, released June 20, 2013; http://datacenter.kidscount.org
-
Washington ranked #15 in the 2012 Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index. Criteria: emotional health; physical health; healthy behavior; work environment; basic access to food, shelter, health care; and a safe and satisfying place to live.
2012 State of Well-Being, Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, released February 28, 2013; www.well-beingindex.com
-
U.S. News and World Report's “Best States for Teen Drivers” rankings are based on driving and road safety laws, federal reports on driver's licenses, car accident fatality, and road-quality statistics. Washington ranked #10.
U.S. News and World Report, March 18, 2010; www.usnews.com
-
The Yahoo! Sports service Rivals.com ranks the states according to the strength of their high school football programs. Washington ranked #22.
“Ranking the States: Where Is the Best Football Played?,” November 18,2011; highschool.rivals.com
-
iVillage ranked the states by hospitable living conditions for women. Criteria: economic success, access to affordable childcare, health care, reproductive rights, female representation in government, and educational attainment. Washington ranked #9.
iVillage, “50 Best to Worst States for Women,” March 14, 2012; www.ivillage.com
-
The League of American Bicyclists's “Bicycle Friendly States” ranked Washington #1. Criteria: legislation and enforcement, policies and programs, infrastructure and funding, education and advocacy, and evaluation and planning.
“Washington Tops the Bicycle-Friendly State Ranking,” May 1, 2013; bicycling.com
-
The federal Corporation for National and Community Service ranked the states and the District of Columbia by volunteer rates. Washington ranked #9 for community service.
“Volunteering and Civic Life in America 2012,” www.volunteeringinamerica.gov, accessed July 24, 2013
-
The Hospital Safety Score ranked states and the District of Columbia on their hospitals' performance scores. Washington ranked #29. Criteria: avoiding preventable harm and medical errors, as demonstrated by 26 hospital safety metrics.
Spring 2013 Hospital Safety Score, May 8, 2013; www.hospitalsafetyscore.org
-
GMAC Insurance ranked the states and the District of Columbia by the performance of their drivers on the GMAC Insurance National Drivers Test, comprised of DMV test questions. Washington ranked #14.
“2011 GMAC Insurance National Drivers Test,” www.gmacinsurance.com, accessed July 23, 2013
-
Washington ranked #3 in a “State Integrity Investigation” analysis of laws and practices intended to deter corruption and promote accountability and openness in campaign finance, ethics laws, lobbying regulations and management of state pension funds.
“What's Your State's Grade?,” www.publicintegrity.org, accessed July 23, 2013
-
Washington ranked #22 among the states and the District of Columbia in total rail miles, as tracked by the Association of American Railroads.
“U.S. Freight Railroad Industry Snapshot: Railroads and States: Total Rail Miles by State: 2011”; www.aar.org, accessed July 23, 2013
-
According to statistics compiled by the Beer Institute, Washington ranked #45 among the states and the District of Columbia in per capita beer consumption of persons 21 years or older.
“Shipments of Malt Beverages and Per Capita Consumption by State 2012;” www.beerinstitute.org
-
According to Concordia University's “Public Education Costs per Pupil by State Rankings,” based on statistics gathered by the U.S. Census Bureau, which includes the District of Columbia, Washington ranked #32.
Concordia University Online; education.cu-portland.edu, accessed July 24, 2013
-
Washington ranked #25 among the states and the District of Columbia in population density based on U.S. Census Bureau data for resident population and total land area. “List of U.S. States by Population Density.”
www.wikipedia.org, accessed July 24, 2013
-
In “America's Health Rankings, 2012 Edition,” by the United Health Foundation, Washington ranked #13. Criteria included: rate of high school graduation; violent crime rate; incidence of infectious disease; childhood immunizations; prevalence of diabetes; per capita public-health funding; percentage of uninsured population; rate of children in poverty; and availability of primary-care physicians.
United Health Foundation; www.americashealthrankings.org, accessed July 24, 2013
-
The TechNet 2012 “State Broadband Index” ranked Washington #1 on the following criteria: broadband adoption; network quality; and economic structure. Improved broadband use is hoped to promote economic development, build strong communities, improve delivery of government services and upgrade educational systems.
TechNet; www.technet.org, accessed July 24, 2013
-
Washington was ranked #8 among the states and District of Columbia on the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy's “State Energy Efficiency Scorecard” for 2012.
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy; aceee.org/sector/state-policy/scorecard, accessed July 24, 2013
Statistical Tables
DEMOGRAPHICS
Resident State and National Population, 1950–2012
Projected State and National Population, 2000–2030
Population by Age, 2012
Population by Race, 2012
Population by Hispanic Origin and Race, 2012
VITAL STATISTICS
Death Rates by Leading Causes, 2010
Death Rates by Selected Causes, 2010
Abortion Rates, 2009
Infant Mortality Rates, 1995–2009
Marriage and Divorce Rates, 2000–2011
ECONOMY
Nominal Gross Domestic Product by Industry, 2012
Real Gross Domestic Product, 2000–2012
Personal Income Per Capita, 1930–2012
Non-Farm Employment by Sector, 2012
Foreign Exports, 2000–2012
Energy Consumption, 2011
LAND AND WATER
Surface Area and Federally-Owned Land, 2007
Land Cover/Use of Non-Federal Rural Land, 2007
Farms and Crop Acreage, 2012
HEALTH AND MEDICAL CARE
Medical Professionals, 2012
Health Insurance Coverage, 2011
HIV, STD, and Tuberculosis Cases and Rates, 2011
Cigarette Smoking, 2011
HOUSING
Home Ownership Rates, 1995–2012
Home Sales, 2000–2010
Value of Owner-Occupied Homes, 2011
EDUCATION
School Enrollment, 2011
Educational Attainment, 2011
Public College Finances, FY 2012
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAVEL
Motor Vehicle Registrations and Drivers Licenses, 2011
Domestic Travel Expenditures, 2009
Retail Gasoline Prices, 2013
Public Road Length, 2011
CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
Full-Time Law Enforcement Officers, 2011
Prison Population, 2000–2012
Crime Rate, 2011
GOVERNMENT AND FINANCE
Local Governments by Type, 2012
State Government Revenue, 2011
State Government Expenditures, 2011
State Government General Expenditures by Function, 2011
State Government Finances, Cash and Debt, 2011
POLITICS
Composition of the Senate, 1995–2013
Composition of the House of Representatives, 1995–2013
Composition of State Legislature, 2004–2013
Voter Participation in Presidential Elections, 1980–2012
Governors Since Statehood