Back More
Salem Press

Table of Contents

Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700)

Sir Edmund Andros: Report of His Administration

Date: 1690

Author: Sir Edmund Andros

Genre: Report

Summary Overview

Edmund Andros (pronounced Andrews) was a colonial administrator, appointed by England’s King James II as royal governor of the Dominion of New England. Andros arrived in Boston in 1686, and in the months and years that followed, he ruled the dominion—consisting of Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Plymouth, New York, New Jersey, and New Hampshire—with an iron hand. He came to be regarded as so tyrannical that to this day, Connecticut refuses to acknowledge him officially as one of the historical governors of the state. During his years as colonial administrator, he offended virtually everyone. Puritan ministers, who saw him as a hated Papist, were outraged at his efforts to impose Episcopalian (that is, Anglican) worship in Boston. He raised taxes, enforced the oppressive Navigation Acts (a series of acts passed in the 1660s and 1670s enabling England to regulate trade and collect taxes in the colonies), packed the courts, and declared ordinary town meetings illegal—all of which led to open rebellion.

In 1690 Andros submitted to the Committee for Trade and Plantations in England a report about the accomplishments of his administration. In pedestrian language he discusses relationships with French Canadians and with the region’s Indian tribes. In particular, however, he describes events surrounding what has come to be called the Boston Revolt or Boston Rebellion of 1689, which overthrew the colonial administration and led to Andros being arrested, jailed, and shipped back to England to stand trial.

Defining Moment

By the 1680s, discontent was rife in the New England colonies. That discontent began with the Navigation Acts of the 1660s and 1670s. These laws, which regulated trade and shipping in England’s North American colonies, were widely hated, for they imposed heavy duties (that is, taxes) on the colonists and restricted trade. In a broader sense, many colonists resisted what they regarded as royal meddling in the affairs of the Massachusetts colony.

As a consequence of England’s overreach, considerable political unrest erupted in the colonies. In the 1670s, Bacon’s Rebellion in Virginia, led by one Nathaniel Bacon, was in effect a civil war pitting planters and others against the colonial administration. Further turmoil was created by King Philip’s War (1675–76), an effort on the part of a coalition of tribes in Massachusetts to drive the colonists out. Then in 1684, the Court of Chancery in England, in response to a petition from the king, annulled the charter of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, thus incurring the considerable animosity of the colony’s Puritans, confirming them in their belief that they were part of an empire that was not sympathetic to their views. At this point, King James II made the decision to reconfigure the government of New England. In 1686 he appointed Sir Edmund Andros as his royal governor. Andros oversaw the consolidation of the New England colonies into a single polity, the Dominion of New England.

In 1689, news of the Glorious Revolution in England reached the colonies. This event was a peaceful transfer of power from James II, whose Catholicism was a source of British discontent, to his Protestant daughter, Mary, and her husband, William of Orange (a Dutch principality), who ruled as joint monarchs. As part of the new arrangement, William III and Mary II agreed to a Bill of Rights that specified the constitutional rights of English subjects. In response to this news, the Massachusetts Bay colonists seized their chance. They overthrew the Andros regime, jailed the governor, and shipped him to England as a prisoner; similar revolts took place in New York and Maryland. In the aftermath, King William restored representative government in Massachusetts and granted a new royal charter. As a side note, some historians believe that the uncertainty and chaos of these years may have contributed to the hysteria surrounding the 1692 Salem witch trials in Massachusetts.

Author Biography

Edmund Andros was born on December 6, 1637, in London, England. His parents were staunch backers of the king, Charles I, a viewpoint inherited by Andros, a lifelong supporter of the Stuart monarchs. In the 1650s he served in Denmark as an apprentice to his uncle, the captain of a cavalry unit. Later, he served on the continent as a courtier to King Charles I’s sister, Elizabeth of Bohemia, and in the 1660s, he served in the English army fighting the Dutch. After the Stuart monarchy was restored, he and his family were singled out for their loyalty to the Crown. In 1674, Andros was rewarded with an appointment as governor of New York and New Jersey and with a knighthood in 1678. In England he was seen as an efficient and capable administrator, but in the New World he was regarded as arbitrary, heavy-handed, and arrogant. Likely for this reason he was recalled in 1681, but in the meantime he had dealt with a number of complex issues, including border disputes involving Connecticut, Maryland, and the Jerseys and relations with the Indians during King Philip’s War.

“Andros a Prisoner in Boston” as depicted in “Pioneers in the Settlement of America” Vol. 1, by William A. Crafts (1876). By William A. Crafts [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

DD17_Edmund_Andros.jpg

In 1686, Andros returned to America, where he served as the governor of the Dominion of New England, a consolidation of several American colonies in the Northeast. During his three years in this position, he managed to anger virtually all of his constituents: Puritans, who resented his imposition of Episcopalian worship in the Old South Meetinghouse in Boston; merchants for his rigorous enforcement of the onerous Navigation Acts; landholders, angered by his requirement that they take out new patents for their land; the citizens of Connecticut because of his heavy-handed annexation of that colony; and citizens in general through heavy taxation and limitations on town meetings. In the wake of the Glorious Revolution in England, Andros was deposed, jailed, and returned to England, where, met with favor by the king, he was tried and released.

Andros’s career as a colonial administrator was not over. He later served as governor of Virginia (1692–1698), as proprietary governor of Maryland (1693–94), and lieutenant governor of the island of Guernsey (1704–06). He died in London in February 1714; the exact date of his death appears to be uncertain.

Historical Document

Edmund Andros: Report of His Administration

To the Right Hon’ble the Lords of the Committee for Trade and Plantations.

The state of New England under the goverment of Sr Edmond Andros.

That in the yeare 1686 Sir Edmond Andros was by comission under the Create Seale of England appoynted to succeed the President Dudley and Councill in the goverment of the Massachusetts Collony, the Provinces of Hampshire and Maine and the Narragansett Country, to w’ch was annexed the Collonyes of Rhoad Island New Plymouth and the County of Cornwall.

In the yeare 1687 the Collony of Connecticott was also annexed and in the yeare 1688 he received a new Commission for all New England includeing the Province of New Yorke and East and West Jersey, with particuler order and directions to assert and protect the Five warlike Nations or Cantons of Indians, lying West from Albany above the heads of our rivers as far or beyond Maryland vizt Maquaes, Oneydes, Onondages, Caeujes, and Sennekes, as the Kings subjects upon whom the French had made severall incursions, and to demand the setting at liberty severall of them surprized and deteyned by the French, and reparation for sundry goods taken from severall Christians His Majesties subjects in the lawfull prosecution of their trade.

Sir Edmond Andros upon receipt of his Commission went to New Yorke and Albany of which the Indians having no tice, altho’ they were then mett in Councill about goeing to Canada came thither, and were setled, and confirmed under his goverment.

He forthwith signifyed to the Gov’r of Canada His Ma’ties pleasure relateing to the Indians, and made demand from him, pursuant to the above orders, and alsoe to quitt a considerable fort which by incroachment he had built at Oniagra in the Senneka’s Country southward of the Lake within His Ma’ties dominion, about one thousand miles distant from Quebeck in Canada (notwithstanding all the endeavours and opposition made by the Governor of New Yorke, before the annexation) upon an advantageous pass, neare the Indians hunting places, capable greatly to annoy and awe the Indians and obstruct and hinder the trade with them; That thereupon the Governor of Canada did accordingly withdraw the garrison and forces from the sayd Oniagra and those parts, and did further signifie that the Indians by him taken were sent to France, but would write to the King his master about theire releasement.

The severall Provinces and Collonys in New England being soe united, the revenue continued and setled in those parts, for the support of the government, amounted to about twelve thousand pounds per annum and all places were well and quietly setled and in good posture.

The Church of England being unprovided of a place for theyr publique woship, he did, by advice of the Council, borrow the new meeting house in Boston, at such times as the same was unused, untill they could provide otherwise; and accordingly on Sundays went in between eleven and twelve in the morning, and in the afternoone about fower; but understanding it gave offence, hastned the building of a Church, w’ch was effected at the charge of those of the Church of England, where the Chaplaine of the Souldiers performed divine service and preaching.

He was alwayes ready to give grants of vacant lands and confirme defective titles as authorized (the late Corporation not haveing passed or conveyed any pursuant to the directions in their Charter) but not above twenty have passed the seal in the time of his government.

Courts of Judicature were setled in the severall parts, soe as might be most convenient for the ease and benefitt of the subject, and Judges appoynted to hold the Terms and goe the Circuite throughout the Dominion, to administer justice in the best manner and forme, and according to the lawes Customes and statutes of the realme of England, and some peculiar locall prudentiall laws of the Country, not repugnant therto; and fees regulated for all officers.

That particuler care was taken for the due observance of the severall Acts made for the encouragement of navigation and regulateing the plantation trade, whereby the lawfull trade and His Majestys revenue of Customs was considerably increased.

The Indians throughout the goverm’t continued in good order and subjection untill, towards the latter end of the yeare 1688, by some unadvised proceedings of the Inhabitants in the Eastern parts of New England, the late rupture with the Indians there commenced, severall being taken and some killed, when Sir Edmond Andros was at New Yorke more than three hundred miles distant from that place; and upon his speedy returne to Boston (haveing viewed and setled all parts to the Westward) great part of the garrison soldiers with stores and other necessarys were imediately sent Eastward to reinforce those parts, and vessells to secure the coast and fishery, and further forces raysed and appoynted to be under the command of Majr Gen’ll Winthrop, who falling sick and declineing the service, by advice of the Councill he went with them in person and by the settlement of severall garrisons, frequent partyes, marches and pursuits after the enemy, sometimes above one hundred miles into the desart further than any Christian settlement, in w’ch the officers and souldiers of the standing forces always imployed, takeing and destroying their forts and settlem’ts, corne, provision, ammunicion and canooes, dispersed and reduced them to the uttermost wants and necessitys, and soe secured the Countrey, that from the said forces goeing out untill the time of the late revolucion there, and disorderly calling the forces from those parts, not the least loss, damage or spoyle hapned to the inhabitants or fishery, and the Indians were ready to submitt at mercy.

About the latter end of March 1688 Sir Edmond Andros returned for Boston, leaveing the garrisons and souldiers in the Easterne parts in good condition, and sufficiently furnished with provisions and all stores and implyments of warr and vessells for defence of the coast and fishery.

On the 18th of Aprill 1689 severall of His Ma’ties Councill in New England haveing combined and conspired togeather with those who were Magistrates and officers in the late Charter Goverment annually chosen by the people, and severall other persons, to subvert and overthrow the goverment, and in stead thereof to introduce their former Comonwealth; and haveing by their false reports and aspersions gott to their assistance the greatest part of the people, whereof appeared in arms at Boston under the comand of those who were Officers in the sayd former popular goverment, to the number of about two thousand horse and foote; which strange and sudden appearance being wholly a surprize to Sir Edmond Andros, as knowing noe cause or occasion for the same, but understanding that severall of the Councill were at the Councill Chamber where (it being the Ordinary Councill day) they were to meet, and some particularly by hun sent for from distant parts also there, he and those with him went thither. And tho’ (as he passed) the streets were full of armed men, yett none offered him or those that were with him the least rudeness or incivillity, but on the contrary usuall respect; but when he came to the Councill Chamber he found severall of the sayd former popular Majestrates and other cheife persons then present, with those of the Councill, who had noe suitable regard to him, nor the peace and quiet of the Countrey, but instead of giveing any assistance to support the Goverment, made him a prisoner and also imprisoned some members of the Councill and other officers, who in pursuance of their respective dutyes and stations attended on him, and kept them for the space of ten months under severe and close confinement untill by His Ma’ties comand they were sent for England to answer what might be objected them, Where, after summons given to the pretended Agents of New England and their twice appearance at the Councill Board, nothing being objected by them or others, they were discharged. In the time of his confinement being denyed the liberty of discourse or conversation with any person, his own servants to attend him, or any communication or correspondence with any by letters, he hath noe particular knowledge of their further proceedings, but hath heard and understands:—

That soone after the confinem’t of his person, the Confederates [took the] fort and Castle from the Officers that had the comand of them, whom they also imprisoned and dispersed the few souldiers belonging to the two standing Companyes then there, as they did the rest, when they recalled the forces imployed against the Indians Eastward (which two Companys are upon His Ma’ties establishment in England,) in w’ch service halfe a company of the standing forces at New Yorke being also imployed, the officers were surprised and brought prisoners to Boston, and the souldiers dispersed, as the remaining part of them at New Yorke were afterwards upon the revolucion there. The other company was, and remained, at Fort Albany and are both upon establishment to be payd out of His Ma’ties revenue there. And the Confederates at Boston possessed themselves of all His Ma’ties stores, armes ammunicion and other implements of warr, and disabled His Ma’ties man of war the Rose frigatt by secureing the Comander and bringing her sayles on shoare; and at the same time haveing imprisoned the secretary and some other officers, they broke open the Sec’rys Office and seized and conveyed away all records papers and wrightings.

Those Members of His Ma’ties Councill that were in confederacy with the before mencioned popular Majestrates and other cheife actors in this revolucion, tooke upon them the goverment, by the name of a Councill, who not content with the inconveniency they had brought on themselves in the Massachusetts Colony, but to the mine of the poore neighbours, on the twentieth of Aprill gave orders for the drawing off the forces from Pemyquid and other garrisons and places in the Easterne parts, far without the lymitts of their Collony and where the seate of warr with the Indians was, and to seize severall of the officers, and for calling home the vessells appoynted to gard the sea coast and fishery; w’ch was done accordingly, and the forces disbanded, when most of the souldiers belonging to the standing Companys there were dispersed; of which, and their actings at Boston, the Indians haveing notice, (and being supplyed with Amunicion and provision out of a vessell sent from Boston by some of the cheife conspirators before the insurrection to trade with them) they were encouraged and enabled to renew and pursue the warr; and by the assistance of some French who have been seen amongst them and engageing of severall other Indians before unconcerned, increased their numbers, that in a very short tyme severall hundreds of Their Ma’ties subjects were killed and carryed away captive; The Fort at Pemyquid taken; the whole Cuntry of Cornwall, the greatest part of the Province of Maine, and part of the Province of New Hampshire destroyed and deserted; and the principall trade of that countrey, w’ch consisted in a considerable fishery, the getting of masts, yards etc. for the supply of His Ma’tyes navy Roy all, and boards and other lumber for the supply of the other West India plantacions, is almost wholy ruined.

By the encouragem’t and perswasion of those of the Massachusetts the severall other provinces and collonys in New England as far as New Yorke have disunited themselves, and set up their former seperate Charter, or popular goverments without Charter, and by that meanes the whole revenue of the Crowne continued and setled in the severall parts for the support of the Goverment is lost and destroyed.

The usuall time for election of new Majestrates at Boston comeing on in the begining of May 1689, great controversie arose about the setling of Civill Goverment; some being for a new election, and others that the Majestrates chosen and sworn in 1686, before the alteration, should reassume; the latter of which was concluded on by them, and the pretended representatives of the severall towns of the Massachusetts, and assumed by the sd Magistrates accordingly; and thereupon, the old Charter Government, though vacated in Westminster Hall, was reassumed without any regard to the Crowne of England, and they revived and confirmed their former laws contrary and repugnant to the laws and statutes of England; setled their Courts of Judicature, and appointed new officers, and have presumed to try and judge all cases, civill and criminall, and to pass sentence of death on severall of Their Ma’ties’ subjects, some of whom they have caused to be executed.

Alltho in the revenue continued on the Crown for the support of the government, duering his time, the country pay’d but the old establisht rate of a penny in the pound per annum, as given and practised for about fifty years past; the present administrators have, of their own authority, for not above six months, raysed and exacted from the people of the Massachusetts Collony seven rates and a half.

Since this insurrection and alteracion in New England, they doe tollerate an unlimited irregular trade, contrary to the severall Acts of Plantations, Trade and Navigation, now as little regarded as in the time of their former Charter Government; they esteeming noe laws to be binding on them but what are made by themselves, nor admitt English laws to be pleaded there or appeales to his Ma’ty, and many shipps and vessels have since arrived from Scotland, Holland, Newfoundland and other places prohibitted; they having imprisoned his Ma’ty’s Collector, Surveyor and Searcher, and displaced other Custom House officers.

That they sent to Albany to treat with the Indians in those parts, particularly with the Five Nations, Maquaes, &c., and invited them to Boston; which is of ill and dangerouse consequence, by makeing the sayd Indians particularly acquainted with the disunion and seperate governments, and shewing them the countrey and disorders thereof, as far as Boston, giveing thereby the greatest advantage to the French of gaining or subdueing the said Indians, and attempting Fort Albany (the most advanced frontier into the country and great mart of the Beaver and Peltry trade), and of infesting other parts.

The forces raysed and sent out by them the last summer, notwithstanding the great encouragem’t they promised of eight pounds per head, for every Indian that should be killed, besides their pay, proved neither effectuall to suppresse the enemy, or secure the country from further damage and murthers; and upon the winters approaching, the forces were recalled, and the country left exposed to the enemy, who have already over runn and destroyed soe great a part thereof; and now by the assistance of the French of Canada, may probably proceed further into the heart of the country; being soe devided and out of order, unless it shall please His Ma’tie by his owne authority to redress the same, and put a stop to the French and Indians, and thereby prevent the ruine or loss of that whole dominion of New England, and consequently of Their Maj’ties’ other American Plantacions, endangered not only by the want of provisions, but by the many ships, vessells, seamen and other necessarys in New England, capable to supply and transport any force which may annoy or attempt those plantacions; but may be by His Ma’ties authority and comands effectually setled and preserved, and of service against the French or any other Their Ma’ties’ enemys in those parts, with no greater land force than is necessary to be continued there; and a sufficient revenue raysed to defray the charge thereof by dutyes and rates as heretofore hath been practised amongst them, and is usuall in other their Ma’ties; Plantations.

Humbly submitted by E. ANDROS

Source: Narratives of the Insurrections, 1675–1690. vol. 17: Original Narratives of Early American History. Edited by Charles McLean Andrews. Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1915.

Glossary

Maj’ties; Ma’ties, Ma’tyes: i.e., “Majesty’s”

murther: an obsolete spelling of “murder”

Document Analysis

Report of His Administration is a straightforward account by Edmund Andros of the key events of his governorship of the Dominion of New England. The report is written in a kind of dry, bureaucratic language, which a reader might expect from a seasoned administrator. What is noteworthy, however, is that Andros takes no responsibility for the turmoil of 1689. He suggests throughout that his actions and policies have been prudent, evenhanded, and tending toward the good not only of the dominion but also of its English overlords, and that he has been the victim of a conspiracy.

Andros first notes that in 1686 he was commissioned to assume the governorship of the New England colonies; later, Connecticut was annexed to the dominion. He also notes that he was made responsible for the welfare of the Indian tribes, the Five Iroquois Nations consisting of the Maquaes (Mohawks), Oneydes (Oneidas), Onondages, Caeujes (Cayugas), and Sennekes (Senecas). His role in particular was to protect the tribes from incursions by the French. To that end, he contacted the governor of Canada to object to the construction of a fort at Niagara. He reports that Canada cooperated in withdrawing its forces and seeing to the release of Indians who had been taken prisoner. In referring to “Canada,” Andros is referring principally to French Canada, that is, Quebec.

Andros then turns to several issues that were hallmarks of his administration. He contends that generous revenues from taxation continued to be collected—in the amount of £12,000 per year. He discusses his efforts to create a place of worship for Anglicans in Boston. He mentions grants issued for vacant lands, the curing of defective titles to land, and the establishment of Courts of Judicature, or senior courts. He alludes indirectly to the Navigation Acts when he mentions that he enforced regulations bearing on trade and navigation. He returns to discussion of Indian affairs, noting that in 1688 disturbances arose, requiring him to dispatch troops and supplies to quell the uprising.

Andros provides considerable detail about the rebellion that erupted on April 18, 1689. He casts all the blame on the rebellious colonists, stating that numerous of them engaged in a conspiracy to overthrow the government and that they issued false reports and “aspersions.” He indicates his surprise to see two thousand foot soldiers and cavalry troops descending on Boston with a view to restoring the government that existed before the formation of the dominion. He claims that he was treated with respect by the troops and the city’s citizens until he arrived at the council chamber, where he and several of his aides were arrested and thrown into prison. Andros remained in prison for ten months until he was extradited to England for trial by order of the king.

Meanwhile, the revolt continued, although Andros notes that at this point he is relying on secondhand accounts, for his imprisonment cut him off from direct observation of and participation in events. The rebels recalled the troops that were dealing with Indian issues, although some were sent to New York to take part in the contemporaneous revolt against Andros taking place there. He describes various operations having to do with the seizure by the rebels of storage facilities, armaments, ammunition, ships, and records. As he details events in the colonies, he indicates that trade, commerce, and navigation have been so disrupted that the economies of the various colonies were left in ruin. He further comments on an issue that would have been uppermost in the mind of the king: that “the whole revenue of the Crowne continued and setled in the severall parts for the support of the Goverment is lost and destroyed.” He also notes that the French and the Indians acted as allies for council members and others in their efforts to restore pre-dominion government and to elect magistrates, create courts, and appoint new officers. He claims that the restored government, on its own authority, has raised taxes and that violations of the Navigation Acts have created a chaotic situation at the ports, with vessels from numerous nations arriving in contravention of the laws. He also indicates that the policies he initiated with regard to the Indian tribes and French meddling have been abrogated, placing the colonies in general and Boston in particular in danger. He concludes his report with a plea to the king to take action to put a stop to the actions of the French and the Indians so that order can be restored.

Essential Themes

A dominant theme of Report of His Administration, as one might expect from a colonial governor, is that Andros’s three years as governor of the Dominion of New England proceeded smoothly until rebellion broke out. In the early paragraphs, Andros enumerates his accomplishments: consolidating the dominion by the annexation of Connecticut, pacifying the Indian tribes, standing up to French interference out of Canada, enforcing the Navigation Acts, collecting the king’s revenues, and dealing with such local matters as land grants, appointment of judges, and the like. All of this is presented in a way designed to lead the reader to the belief that Andros was a highly successful colonial administrator and indirectly to flatter the Crown for having the foresight and wisdom to appoint him as its agent and representative in the New World

In turning to the revolt that took place in 1689, Andros described the events from his point of view as the aggrieved party. The rebels, he implies, were malcontents who were unable to appreciate everything that the Crown, through him, had accomplished. In his view, he had functioned as an able and efficient minister of the king but he became the victim of men who spread false information and who were bent on restoring their own power and authority. Accordingly, he is diligent in describing the ill effects of the rebellion: loss of tax revenue, restiveness among the Indians, chaos in the ports, and decline in the economic welfare of the colonies. He shifts some of the blame, too, to the French Canadians and the Indians; it is worth noting that the French and the Indians for decades would continue to disrupt the British presence in North American, a rivalry that culminated in the French and Indian War of 1756–63.

—Michael J. O’Neal, PhD

Bibliography and Further Reading

1 

Andros, Edmund. The Andros Tracts: Being a Collection of Pamphlets and Official Papers (1868). Edited by William Henry Whitmore. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing, 2010.

2 

Barnes, Viola Florence. The Dominion of New England: A Study in British Colonial Policy. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1960.

3 

Cook, Joel. Sir Edmund Andros. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Library, 2009.

4 

Lovejoy, David S. The Glorious Revolution in America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1987.

5 

Lustig, Mary Lou. The Imperial Executive in America: Sir Edmund Andros, 1637–1714. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002.

6 

Stanwood, Owen. The Empire Reformed: English America in the Age of the Glorious Revolution. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.

Websites

7 

Scanlon, James Edward, “Sir Edmund Andros (1637–ca. 1714).” Dictionary of Virginia. 2010, http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Andros_Sir_Edmund_1637-ca_1714#start_entry.

8 

“The Great Boston Revolt of 1689.” New England History Society website, http://www.newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/great-boston-revolt-1689/.

Citation Types

Type
Format
MLA 9th
"Sir Edmund Andros: Report Of His Administration." Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700), edited by David Simonelli, Salem Press, 2017. Salem Online, online.salempress.com/articleDetails.do?articleName=DD17C_0051.
APA 7th
Sir Edmund Andros: Report of His Administration. Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700), In D. Simonelli (Ed.), Salem Press, 2017. Salem Online, online.salempress.com/articleDetails.do?articleName=DD17C_0051.
CMOS 17th
"Sir Edmund Andros: Report Of His Administration." Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700), Edited by David Simonelli. Salem Press, 2017. Salem Online, online.salempress.com/articleDetails.do?articleName=DD17C_0051.