Back More
Salem Press

Table of Contents

Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700)

Declaration of the Gentlemen, Merchants and Inhabitants of Boston, and the Country Adjacent

Date: 1689

Author: Cotton Mather

Genre: Proclamation

Summary Overview

In 1685, King James II of England, a Catholic and a stout advocate of the divine right of kings, dispatched Sir Edmund Andros to the New England colonies as his royal governor. To strengthen his grip on the colonies, he consolidated several of them—the Massachusetts Bay Colony, Plymouth, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, and later Connecticut—into a single entity, the Dominion of New England. Andros proved to be an autocratic and extremely unpopular governor. He imposed new taxes, he strictly enforced the hated Navigation Acts (which interfered with trade and imposed new taxes on merchants), and he tried to enforce Episcopalian (that is, Church of England) worship in the Boston Meetinghouse. He abolished the colonial assemblies, and in general he abrogated the rights of the colonies’ citizens.

In 1689, colonists in Boston learned that the previous year, in an event called the Glorious Revolution, James II had been deposed, driven into exile, and replaced with Protestant monarchs. The elated colonists staged a coup. They stormed the Boston fort and demanded that Andros be ousted. Some of the “gentlemen, merchants, and inhabitants of Boston,” among them Cotton Mather, wanted to curb the passions of the mob, so they composed a declaration calling for the arrest of members of the Andros administration. On April 18, 1689, the declaration, which included an open letter to Andros calling for his resignation, was read from the balcony of the Boston Town House (i.e., the town hall). The declaration was later printed and disseminated as a broadside.

Defining Moment

In the 1680s, discontent was widespread in the New England colonies. That discontent reached back at least as far as 1660, when the first of the so-called Navigation Acts was passed by the British Parliament. This act, and similar acts that followed, imposed taxes on merchants and traders and restricted trade. Many of the colonists, particularly Puritans in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, felt that the acts amounted to nothing more than royal and Parliamentary meddling in colonial affairs. That the Stuart monarchs, Charles II and his successor and brother, James II, were Catholic rendered them even more unpopular.

Political unrest was spreading. In the 1670s, Bacon’s Rebellion in Virginia was in effect a civil war pitting planters and plantation owners against the colonial authorities. Further unrest came in the form of conflict with Indians: King Philip’s War (1675–76) was a bloody conflict between a coalition of Indian tribes and Massachusetts colonists. But the final blow came in 1684 when the British Court of Chancery, acting on a petition from James II, revoked the charter of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. This was a last straw, particularly among New England Puritans, who had long concluded that their views and the views of their English overlords would never be aligned. It was at this point that James II, never much of a fan of representative government (it was Parliament, after all, that executed his father in 1649), decided to restructure the American colonies. To that end, he appointed Sir Edmund Andros as his royal governor and consolidated the New England colonies into the Dominion of New England.

James II was no more popular in England than he was in the colonies. The nation’s Protestant elite were troubled by his Catholicism and his pro-French views, and they suspected him of intending to weaken Parliament and wield the scepter of an absolute monarch. When his wife, Queen Mary, gave birth to a Catholic heir to the throne, the nobles took action. They invited William of Orange (a Dutch principality), and his wife, Mary, the Protestant daughter of James II, to assume the throne, driving James into exile. When news of the so-called Glorious Revolution reached the colonies, the colonists seized the opportunity to oust Edmund Andros and reaffirm their rights. Similar revolts took place in New York and Maryland. But a number of Boston’s elite citizens, in an effort to quell mob violence, formulated a declaration specifying their grievances and calling for the detention of members of the Andros administration.

Author Biography

Although the declaration was the collective effort of a number of Boston’s prominent citizens, authorship of the declaration is generally attributed to Cotton Mather. Mather was born on February 12, 1663, in Boston, the eldest son of Puritan divine Increase Mather and the grandson of John Cotton and Richard Mather, both prominent Puritan ministers. He graduated from Harvard College in 1678 and later become the assistant pastor of his father’s Boston church. In 1685, he would become pastor of the church.

Mather was one of the most influential spiritual leaders in colonial American. He was a prolific author, with some four hundred separate works to his credit. His major work was the Magnalia Christi Americana (“A History of the Wonderful Works of Christ in America”), a work in seven volumes that provided an ecclesiastical history of New England and portraits of some of the colony’s most prominent early citizens. In 1689 Boston, he was one of the city’s leading citizens, and his oratorical fame (despite as a youth having a noticeable stammer) made him the logical choice to compose the Declaration. Indeed, Mather was known for an oftentimes florid, pedantic, and overwrought style—qualities that mark the Declaration—so his fingerprints would seem to be all over the document’s text.

Later, in 1692, the governor of Massachusetts appointed a commission to look into the cases against nineteen people in Salem who were accused of witchcraft. Mather, who called for New England’s return to its early Puritan roots, believed in witchcraft, regarding it as the last effort of Satan to undermine Puritanism. The judges asked Mather to write an account of the proceedings of the Salem witch trials, which Mather published in 1693 as The Wonders of the Invisible World.

Mather had an abiding interest in scientific investigation. One of his African slaves, a man named Onesimus, explained to Mather in 1706 that he had been inoculated against smallpox as a child. The process, called variolation, involved infecting a person with a mild case of the disease, rendering the person immune. In the years that followed, Mather became embroiled in a lengthy dispute between those who advocated variolation and those who opposed it. He outlived two wives and all but two of his fifteen children. He died in Boston on February 13, 1728.

Historical Document

Declaration of the Gentlemen, Merchants and Inhabitants of Boston, and the Country Adjacent by Cotton Mather

  1. We have seen more than a decad of Years rolled away since the English World had the Discovery of an horrid Popish Plot, wherein the bloody Devotoes of Rome had in their Design and Prospect no less than the Extinction of the Protestant Religion: which mighty Work they called the utter subduing of a Pestilent Heresy; wherein (they said) there never were such Hopes of Success since the Death of Queen Mary, as now in our Days. And we were of all Men the most insensible, if we should apprehend a Countrey so remarkable for the true Profession and pure Exercise of the Protestant Religion as New-England is, wholly unconcerned in the Infamous Plot. To crush and break a Countrey so entirely and signally made up of Reformed Churches, and at length to involve it in the miseries of an utter Extirpation, must needs carry even a Supererogation of Merit with it among such as were intoxicated with a Bigotry inspired into them by the great Scarlet Whore.

  2. To get us within the reach of the Desolation desired for us, it was no improper thing that we should first have our Charter vacated, and the Hedge which kept us from the wild Beasts of the Field, effectually broken down. The Accomplishment of this was hastned by the unwearied Sollicitations and slanderous Accusations of a Man, for his Malice and Falshood well known unto us all. Our Charter was with a most injurious Pretence (and scarce that) of Law, condemned before it was possible for us to appear at Westminster in the legal Defence of it; and without a fair leave to answer for our selves, concerning the Crimes falsly laid to our Charge, we were put under a President and Council, without any liberty for an Assembly, which the other American Plantations have, by a Commission from his Majesty.

  3. The Commission was as Illegal for the Form of it, as the Way of obtaining it was Malicious and Unreasonable: yet we made no Resistance thereunto as we could easily have done; but chose to give all Mankind a Demonstration of our being a People sufficiently dutiful and loyal to our King: and this with yet more Satisfaction, because we took Pains to make our selves believe as much as ever we could of the Whedle then offer’d unto us; That his Magesty’s Desire was no other then the happy Encrease and Advance of these Provinces by their more immediate Dependance on the Crown of England. And we were convinced of it by the Courses immediately taken to damp and spoyl our Trade; whereof Decayes and Complaints presently filled all the Country; while in the mean time neither the Honour nor the Treasure of the King was at all advanced by this new Model of our Affairs, but a considerable Charge added unto the Crown.

  4. In little more than half a Year we saw this Commission superseded by another yet more absolute and Arbitrary, with which Sir Edmond Andross arrived as our Governour: who besides his Power, with the Advice and Consent of his Council, to make Laws and raise Taxes as he pleased, had also Authority by himself to Muster and Imploy all Persons residing in the Territory as occasion shall serve; and to transfer such Forces to any English Plantation in America, as occasion shall require. And several Companies of Souldiers were now brought from Europe, to support what was to be imposed upon us, not without repeated Menaces that some hundreds more were intended for us.

  5. The Government was no sooner in these Hands, but Care was taken to load Preferments principally upon such Men as were Strangers to and Haters of the People: and every ones Observation hath noted, what Qualifications recommended a Man to publick Offices and Employments, only here and there a good Man was used, where others could not easily be had; the Governour himself, with Assertions now and then falling from him, made us jealous that it would be thought for his Majesties Interest, if this People were removed and another succeeded in their room: And his far-fetch’d Instruments that were growing rich among us, would gravely inform us, that it was not for his Majesties Interest that we should thrive. But of all our Oppressors we were chiefly squeez’d by a Crew of abject Persons fetched from New York, to be the Tools of the Adversary, standing at our right Hand; by these were extraordinary and intollerable Fees extorted from every one upon all Occasions, without any Rules but those of their own insatiable Avarice and Beggary; and even the probate of a Will must now cost as many Pounds perhaps as it did Shillings heretofore; nor could a small Volume contain the other Illegalities done by these Horse-leeches in the two or three Years that they have been sucking of us; and what Laws they made it was as impossible for us to know, as dangerous for us to break; but we shall leave the Men of Ipswich or Plimouth (among others) to tell the Story of the Kindness which has been shown them upon this Account. Doubtless a Land so ruled as once New-England was, has not without many Fears and Sighs beheld the wicked walking on every Side, and the vilest Men exalted.

  6. It was now plainly affirmed, both by some in open Council, and by the same in private Converse, that the People in New-England were all Slaves, and the only difference between them and Slaves is their not being bought and sold; and it was a Maxim delivered in open Court unto us by one of the Council, that we must not think the Priviledges of English men would follow us to the End of the World: Accordingly we have been treated with multiplied Contradictions to Magna Charta, the Rights of which we laid claim unto. Persons who did but peaceably object against the raising of Taxes without an Assembly, have been for it fined, some twenty, some thirty, and others fifty Pounds. Packt and pickt Juries have been very common things among us, when, under a pretended Form of Law, the Trouble of some honest and worthy Men has been aimed at: but when some of this Gang have been brought upon the Stage, for the most detestable Enormities that ever the Sun beheld, all Men have with Admiration seen what Methods have been taken that they might not be treated according to their Crimes. Without a Verdict, yea, without a Jury sometimes have People been fined most unrighteously; and some not of the meanest Quality have been kept in long and close Imprisonment without any the least Information appearing against them, or an Habeas Corpus allowed unto them. In short, when our Oppressors have been a little out of Mony, ‘twas but pretending some Offence to be enquired into, and the most innocent of Men were continually put into no small Expence to answer the Demands of the Officers, who must have Mony of them, or a Prison for them, tho none could accuse them of any Misdemeanour.

  7. To plunge the poor People every where into deeper Incapacities, there was one very comprehensive Abuse given to us; Multitudes of pious and sober Men through the Land scrupled the Mode of Swearing on the Book, desiring that they might Swear with an uplifted Hand, agreeable to the ancient Custom of the Colony; and though we think we can prove that the Common Law amongst us (as well as in some other places under the English Crown) not only indulges, but even commands and enjoins the Rite of lifting the Hand in Swearing; yet they that had this Doubt, were still put by from serving upon any Juries; and many of them were most unaccountably Fined and Imprisoned. Thus one Grievance is a Trojan Horse, in the Belly of which it is not easy to recount how many insufferable Vexations have been contained.

  8. Because these Things could not make us miserable fast enough, there was a notable Discovery made of we know not what flaw in all our Titles to our Lands; and tho, besides our purchase of them from the Natives, and besides our actual peaceable unquestioned Possession of them for near threescore Years, and besides the Promise of K. Charles II. in his Proclamation sent over to us in the Year 1683, That no Man here shall receive any Prejudice in his Free-hold or Estate, We had the Grant of our Lands, under the Seal of the Council of Plimouth: which Grant was Renewed and Confirmed unto us by King Charles I. under the Great Seal of England; and the General Court which consisted of the Patentees and their Associates, had made particular Grants hereof to the several Towns (though ‘twas now deny’d by the Governour, that there was any such Thing as a Town) among us; to all which Grants the General Court annexed for the further securing of them, A General Act, published under the Seal of the Colony, in the Year 1684. Yet we were every day told, That no Man was owner of a Foot of Land in all the Colony. Accordingly, Writs of Intrusion began every where to be served on People, that after all their Sweat and their Cost upon their formerly purchased Lands, thought themselves Freeholders of what they had. And the Governor caused the Lands pertaining to these and those particular Men, to be measured out for his Creatures to take possession of; and the Right Owners, for pulling up the Stakes, have passed through Molestations enough to tire all the Patience in the World. They are more than a few, that were by Terrors driven to take Patents for their Lands at excessive rates, to save them from the next that might petition for them: and we fear that the forcing of the People at the Eastward hereunto, gave too much Rise to the late unhappy Invasion made by the Indians on them. Blanck Patents were got ready for the rest of us, to be sold at a Price, that all the Mony and Moveables in the Territory could scarce have paid. And several Towns in the Country had their Commons begg’d by Persons (even by some of the Council themselves) who have been privately encouraged thereunto, by those that sought for Occasions to impoverish a Land already Peeled, Meeted out and Trodden down.

  9. All the Council were not ingaged in these ill Actions, but those of them which were true Lovers of their Country were seldom admitted to, and seldomer consulted at the Debates which produced these unrighteous Things: Care was taken to keep them under Disadvantages; and the Governor, with five or six more, did what they would. We bore all these, and many more such Things, without making any attempt for any Relief; only Mr. Mather, purely out of respect unto the Good of his Afflicted Country, undertook a Voyage into England; which when these Men suspected him to be preparing for, they used all manner of Craft and Rage, not only to interrupt his Voyage, but to ruin his Person too. God having through many Difficulties given him to arrive at White-hall, the King, more than once or twice, promised him a certain Magna Charta for a speedy Redress of many Things which we were groaning under: and in the mean time said, That our Governor should be written unto, to forbear the Measures that he was upon. However, after this, we were injured in those very Things which were complained of; and besides what Wrong hath been done in our Civil Concerns, we suppose the Ministers and the Churches every where have seen our Sacred Concerns apace going after them: How they have been Discountenanced, has had a room in the Reflection of every Man, that is not a Stranger in our Israel.

  10. And yet that our Calamity might not be terminated here, we are again Briar’d in the Perplexities of another Indian War, how, or why, is a mystery too deep for us to unfold. And tho’ ‘tis judged that our Indian Enemies are not above 100 in Number, yet an Army of One thousand English hath been raised for the Conquering of them; which Army of our poor Friends and Brethren now under Popish Commanders (for in the Army as well as in the Council, Papists are in Commission) has been under such a Conduct, that not one Indian hath been kill’d, but more English are supposed to have died through sickness and hardship, than we have Adversaries there alive; and the whole War hath been so managed, that we cannot but suspect in it a Branch of the Plot to bring us low; which we leave to be further enquir’d into in due time.

  11. We did nothing against these Proceedings, but only cry to our God; they have caused the cry of the Poor to come unto him, and he hears the cry of the Afflicted. We have been quiet hitherto, and so still we should have been, had not the Great God at this time laid us under a double engagement to do something for our Security: besides what we have in the strangely unanimous Inclination which our Countrymen by extreamest necessities are driven unto. For first, we are informed that the rest of the English America is alarmed with just and great Fears, that they may be attaqu’d by the French, who have lately (‘tis said) already treated many of the English with worse then Turkish Cruelties; and while we are in equal Danger of being surprised by them, it is high time we should be better guarded, than we are like to be while the Government remains in the hands by—which it hath been held of late. Moreover, we have understood, (though the Governour has taken all imaginable care to keep us all ignorant thereof) that the Almighty God hath been pleased to prosper the noble Undertaking of the Prince of Orange, to preserve the three Kingdoms from the horrible brinks of Popery and Slavery, and to bring to a condign Punishment those worst of Men, by whom English Liberties have been destroy’d; in compliance with which glorious Action we ought surely to follow the Patterns which the Nobility, Gentry and Commonalty in several parts of those Kingdoms have set before us, though they therein chiefly proposed to prevent what we already endure.

  12. We do therefore seize upon the Persons of those few ill Men which have been (next to our Sins) the grand Authors of our Miseries; resolving to secure them, for what Justice, Orders from his Highness with the English Parliament shall direct, lest, ere we are aware, we find (what we may fear, being on all sides in Danger) our selves to be by them given away to a Forreign Power, before such Orders can reach unto us; for which Orders we now humbly wait. In the mean time firmly believing, that we have endeavoured nothing but what meer Duty to God and our Country calls for at our Hands: We commit our Enterprise unto the Blessing of Him, who hears the cry of the Oppressed, and advise all our Neighbours, for whom we have thus ventured our selves, to joyn with us in Prayers and all just Actions, for the Defence of the Land.

Source: Narratives of the Insurrections, 1675–1690. Edited by Charles M. Andrews. Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1915.

Glossary

habeas corpus: from the Latin “You may have the body”: a legal principle that provides a remedy against unlawful detention or arrest

Magna Carta: the 1215 document signed by King John that acknowledged the rights of the rebellious English barons; an early document in the history of constitutional government

patents: legal documents that transferred ownership of land from the sovereign to individuals

Popish: of or pertaining to Catholicism, or the pope

Popish Plot: (1678) fictitious plot alleging that Jesuits planned to assassinate King Charles II and install his Catholic brother on the throne; the claims were fabricated by Titus Oates, an Anglican minister

Scarlet Whore: i.e., the Scarlet Whore of Babylon; Catholicism

Trojan Horse: an allusion to the ruse used by the Greeks to enter Troy during the Trojan War; as a figure of speech, a trick or stratagem designed to invite an opponent into one’s protected domain

Document Analysis

The Declaration consists of twelve numbered paragraphs, each of which, with the exception of the last, specifies a grievance against the Crown and particularly against the colonial administration under Sir Edmond Andros. In the first paragraph, the authors refer to the Popish Plot, a sensational event—but a trumped-up one—that had taken place in 1678. The authors regard the plot as part of an effort to bring down the Protestant church and supplant it with Catholicism, the “Scarlet Whore” (that is, the Whore of Babylon, mentioned in the biblical Book of Revelation and often identified with the Roman Catholic Church; here, possibly a veiled allusion to James II’s Catholic wife). The second paragraph takes up the annulment of the charter of the Massachusetts Bay Company at the hands of King James II in 1684. Doing so removed “the Hedge which kept us from the wild Beasts of the Field,” an example of the overwrought language that pervades the declaration. The authors allege in the third paragraph that the purpose of this step was to make the colony more dependent on the Crown; one of its ill effects was to dampen trade.

The fourth paragraph makes reference to Sir Edmund Andros, the royal governor appointed by the king. In the fourth and fifth paragraphs, the authors enumerate their specific grievances and the abuses to which they believe they were subjected during Andros’s administration. They argue that Andros was able to raise taxes and make laws in an arbitrary fashion. He mustered troops for any purpose he desired. Troops were brought from England to support the reorganized government, turning the colony into a virtual military state. The governor was able to “load Preferments principally upon such Men as were Strangers to and Haters of the People.” Further, “intollerable Fees” were “extorted from every one upon all Occasions.” The cost, for example, of probating a will exploded. The men who carried out these policies were characterized as “Horse-leeches in the two or three Years that they have been sucking of us.”

The sixth paragraph continues the specification of grievances, grievances that violate the provisions of the Magna Carta, the thirteenth-century document that granted certain rights to the English barons and began the evolution toward constitutional government. The authors assert that the policies of the colonial administration have turned the colonists into slaves. People have been fined simply for objecting to taxes. Juries have been packed and have rendered verdicts that are oppressive and unjust. Very often these verdicts have led to unjust imprisonment, which led to further abuses as prison officers exploited the system to enrich themselves from the pockets of prisoners.

The seventh paragraph cites a grievance that likely will sound strange to modern ears. Traditionally, a juror could swear simply by raising his hand while taking an oath. Under Andros, however, potential jurors have been required to take their oath by placing their hand on the Bible, a procedure to which they objected based on the belief that a person should not invoke God or scripture to affirm truthfulness in a civil matter. The result has been that they have not been allowed to serve on juries and in some instances have been fined.

The eighth paragraph takes up the issue of title to land. The authors recite the history of proclamations and grants that entitled colonists to ownership of their land. Under the new government, however, “we were every day told, That no Man was owner of a Foot of Land in all the Colony.” Legal writs were served on people who believed they were freeholders of the land they occupied. However, “the Governor caused the Lands pertaining to these and those particular Men, to be measured out for his Creatures to take possession of; and the Right Owners, for pulling up the Stakes, have passed through Molestations enough to tire all the Patience in the World.” In the ninth paragraph, the authors describe their unsuccessful efforts to redress their grievances, in particular, interference with Cotton Mather’s attempt to sail to England to seek relief. The tenth paragraph points to an Indian disturbance used as a pretext to bring an excessive number of “Popish” troops to the colony: “the whole War hath been so managed, that we cannot but suspect in it a Branch of the Plot to bring us low.”

In the eleventh paragraph, the authors raise fears about the French Canadians, “who have lately (‘tis said) already treated many of the English with worse then Turkish Cruelties.” The authors then allude to the Glorious Revolution in England and the accession of King William III to the throne. They believe that the new monarch will preserve the kingdoms and the colonies from Popery and slavery. In the final paragraph, the authors call for the arrest and detention of “those few ill Men” who have been “the grand Authors of our Miseries.” The declaration concludes with a statement that the rebels are doing their duty in relieving oppression and calls upon the other colonies to join in their prayers.

Essential Themes

In his Magnalia Christi Americana (p. 294), Cotton Mather commented on the origin of the Declaration:

... some of the Principal Gentlemen in Boston consulting what was be done in this Extraordinary Juncture, They all agreed that they would, if it were possible, extinguish all Essays in the People towards an Insurrection, in daily Hopes of Orders from England for their Safety: But that if the Country People by any violent Motions push’d the Matter on so far, as to make a Revolution unavoidable, then to prevent shedding of Blood by an ungoverned Mobile, some of the Gentlemen present should appear at the Head of the Action with a Declaration accordingly prepared.

Mather thus made clear that the purpose of the declaration was to prevent the outbreak of violence and the shedding of blood; interesting, the language suggests that the authors saw what was coming and prepared the declaration in advance. In light of the news from England about the deposition of King James II, the people of Boston and surrounding areas were inclined to take extreme measures in removing Andros from office. Mather and his fellow “gentlemen” composed and delivered the declaration in an effort to ensure that the Boston revolution was bloodless. The overwrought and inflammatory language that pervades the document can be viewed as safety valve for releasing the frustration and anger of the colonists as they enter a new phase of their history.

Nevertheless, Mather enumerates the grievances the colonists nursed against the colonial administration. He pulls no punches in making clear the attitude of the colonists toward the Popish king of England, Andros, and the governor’s administrators. These grievances pertained not just to such administrative matters as taxes, trade, land deeds, the court system, and the like. At bottom, the declaration, written from a Puritan perspective, sees a wider conspiracy to supplant the Protestant faith with “Popery”—that is, Catholicism, the “Scarlet Whore.”

—Michael J. O’Neal, PhD

Bibliography and Further Reading

1 

Byfield, Nathanael. An Account of the Late Revolution in New-England: Together with the Declaration of the Gentlemen, Merchants, and Inhabitants of Boston, and the Country Adjacent, April 18, 1689. Gale, 2012. (Originally published in 1689.)

2 

Kennedy, Rick. The First American Evangelical: A Short Life of Cotton Mather. Eerdmans, 2015.

3 

Labaree, Benjamin Woods. Colonial Massachusetts: A History. KTO Press, 1979.

4 

Lovejoy, David S. The Glorious Revolution in America. Wesleyan University Press, 1987.

5 

Mather, Cotton. Magnalia Christi Americana, ed. Kenneth B. Murdock. Harvard University Press, 1977.

6 

Steele, Ian K. “Origins of Boston’s Revolutionary Declaration of 18 April 1689.” New England Quarterly 62, no. 1 (March 1989): 75–81.

Website

7 

“The Great Boston Revolt of 1689.” New England History Society website, http://www.newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/great-boston-revolt-1689/.

Citation Types

Type
Format
MLA 9th
"Declaration Of The Gentlemen, Merchants And Inhabitants Of Boston, And The Country Adjacent." Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700), edited by David Simonelli, Salem Press, 2017. Salem Online, online.salempress.com/articleDetails.do?articleName=DD17C_0050.
APA 7th
Declaration of the Gentlemen, Merchants and Inhabitants of Boston, and the Country Adjacent. Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700), In D. Simonelli (Ed.), Salem Press, 2017. Salem Online, online.salempress.com/articleDetails.do?articleName=DD17C_0050.
CMOS 17th
"Declaration Of The Gentlemen, Merchants And Inhabitants Of Boston, And The Country Adjacent." Defining Documents in World History: The 17th Century (1601-1700), Edited by David Simonelli. Salem Press, 2017. Salem Online, online.salempress.com/articleDetails.do?articleName=DD17C_0050.